PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF NATIONAL AND CULTURAL IDENTITY OF A PERSONALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2023-6-04Keywords:
national-cultural identity, socio-cultural formation, feeling-values, “I-Ukrainian” – “We-Ukrainians”Abstract
The article considers national and cultural identity as a multi-level sociocultural formation, namely: a macro phenomenon that reflects the mentality and culture of the Ukrainian people in general and creates a national framework; a mesophenomenon that absorbs the peculiarities of the mentality of a certain region of Ukraine (regional identity) and a microphenomenon that is related to the national self-concept of an individual and involves identification with the nation, a sense of belonging to the Ukrainian people. It has been proven that national-cultural identity is a socio-personal construct that synthesizes socio-cultural and personal, that is, it reflects both the national and cultural experience of a certain people, which are factors of national unity, and also involves the identification of oneself with a certain nation, the perception of oneself and others as bearers of national qualities, a formed national self-concept of the individual. The structure of the national-cultural identity, which contains an axiological component based on the national idea, is characterized; cognitive component reflected in national intelligence; an emotional-sensual component based on feelings-values – “I-Ukrainian” – “We-Ukrainians”; a praxeological component related to the subjective activity of an individual in the practical implementation of the ideas of national and cultural identity.
The interdisciplinary nature of national-cultural identity, in particular, its integration with basic psychological phenomena, has been established. The following groups of psychological determinants are singled out: 1) motivational and axiological, based on the motivational and value-meaning spheres of the individual; 2) praxeological, based on the subject sphere of the individual; 3) analytical, based on the reflective sphere of the individual.
References
Bekh, I.D. (2003). Vykhovannia osobystosti: u 2 kn. Kn. 2: Osobystisno oriientovanyi pidkhid: naukovo-teoretychni zasady. Lybid.
Bekh, I.D. (2008). Vykhovannia osobystosti : pidruchnyk. Kyiv : Lybid, 2008. 848 s.
Bekh, I.D. (1999). Tsinnisna systema u rozvytku osobystosti. Visnyk Poltavskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho instytutu im. V. H. Korolenka, 1(5), 3–20.
Bekh, I.D. (2011). Psykholohichni mekhanizmy skhodzhennia osobystosti do dukhovnykh tsinnostei. Pedahohika i psykholohiia, 2, 37–44.
Boryshevskyi, M. Y. (2012). Osobystist u vymirakh samosvidomosti: monohrafiia. Vydavnychyi budynok «Ellada».
Festinger, L.A. (1957). Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanstone, Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=3850
Heckhausen, H. (1989). Motivation und Handeln. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08870-8
Leontyev, A.N. (1977/2009). Activity and Consciousness. In The Development of Mind (S0viet transl.) (pp. 395–409). Erythrós Press and Media.
Leontyev, A.N. (1978/2009). The Development of Mind (S0viet transl.). Erythrós Press and Media.
Payne, T.R. (1968). S. L. Rubinstein and the philosophical foundations of soviet psychology. New York: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Pelahesha, N.Ye. (2008). Ukraina u smyslovykh viinakh postmodernu: transformatsiia ukrainskoi natsionalnoi identychnosti v umovakh hlobalizatsii. NISD.
Rokeach, M. (1976). The nature of human values and value system. Current Perspectives in Social Psychology (E.P. Hollander and R.G. Hant eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruchka, A.O. (2012). Tsinnosti i smysly yak komponenty sotsiokulturnoi realnosti. U N. Kostenko Red., Smyslova morfolohiia sotsiumu (ss. 91–123). Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy.
Rybalka, V. (2003). Osobystist u filosofsko-psykholohichnii kontseptsii S. L. Rubinshteina. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo, 2(12), 12–18.
Shuhai, M.A. (2002). Psykholohichnyi analiz rozvytku natsionalnoi refleksii v protsesi navchalnoi diialnosti molodshykh shkoliariv. Candidate’s dissertation. Rivne: RDHU.
Tatenko, V.O. (2017). Metodolohiia subiektno-vchynkovoho pidkhodu: sotsialno-psykholohichnyi vymir. Milenium.
Tatenko, V.O. (2021). Sotsialna psykholohiia natsiietvorennia: subiektno-vchynkovyi pidkhid (2 vyd., pererobl. i dopov.). Imeks-LTD.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1), Problems of General Psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum Press. (Original Work Published 1934).
Yamnytskyi, V.M. (2006). Rozvytok zhyttietvorchoi aktyvnosti osobystosti: teoriia ta eksperyment. Pivd. nauk. tsentr APN Ukrainy, Rivnen. derzh. humanit. un-t. Odesa.
Zaniuk, S.S. (2002). Psykholohiia motyvatsii: navch. posib. dlia stud. vyshch. navch. zakl. Lybid.
Zhelanova, V.V., Matviienko, O.V. (2022). Natsionalno-kulturna identychnist osobystosti: sutnist ta struktura. Innovatsiina pedahohika. 1(49), 17–20.
