SOCIALISATION CONTEXTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALIZATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND WAR: STATUS AND PROBLEMS (based on the materials of the empirical research)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2023-6-05Keywords:
socialisation, socialisation contexts of schoolchildren’s development, students of general secondary education institutions, digitization of the educational environmentAbstract
The article presents the materials of a research aimed at identifying the peculiarities of the socialization of students of general secondary education institutions of communal and private forms of ownership in the conditions of digitalization of the educational environment and war, collected through an online survey. Based on the data of the empirical research, the socialization contexts of the development of students of the 5th – 11th grades were singled out; its interpretation was carried out in relation to the actual needs of schoolchildren and satisfaction in the conditions of the educational environment. Socialization contexts are structured into ten lines of development of schoolchildren, namely: social-emotional development, social-communicative interaction, social behaviour, sociallyoriented activity, social activity and initiative, social competence, social well-being, social experience, social (digital) identification, social expectations, which are revealed in an integrative relationship and with a certain penetration of the socio-emotional. Using examples of the features of the socialization contexts of schoolchildren’s development in the conditions of digitalization of the educational environment and war, signs of the manifestation of tendencies are outlined and possible risks of their development are predicted. The study reflects the age-specific peculiarities of thinking and skills of adolescent and senior schoolchildren, their assessment of the situation of social development in the educational environment and the possibilities of their own participation in its optimisation, as well as their idea of an ideal educational environment. The data of the experimental section can also be interpreted in terms of the state of the social component of learning losses in its individual characteristics, and can be used to optimise educational practice, in particular, to design the educational and developmental environment of general secondary education students during the war and in post-war reconstruction.
References
Alieksieienko, T. F. (2007). Sotsializatsiya osobystosti: mozhlyvosti y ryzyky: naukovometodychnyy posibnyk. Pedahohichna dumka.
Alieksieienko, T. F. (2023). Vyklyky tsyfrovoyi sotsializatsiyi shkolyariv pokolinnya Z u konteksti transformatsiynykh zmin v osviti. U I.A. Tverdokhlib (Red.), Teoriya i praktyka vykorystannya informatsiynykh tekhnolohiy v umovakh tsyfrovoyi transformatsiyi osvity. Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference, June 29, 2023, Kyiv. (pp. 9–12). Mykhailo Drahomanov State University. https://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/41423/materialy%20konferentsii.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Boston Consulting Group & World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education: unlocking the potential of technology. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
Bykov, V.Yu., Liashenko, O.I., Lytvynova, S.G., Lugovyi, V.I., Malovanyi, Y.I., Pinchuk, O.P., & Topuzov, O.M. (2022). Naukovo-metodychne zabezpechennya tsyfrovizatsiyi osvity Ukrayiny: stan, problemy, perspektyvy. Naukovo-analitychna dopovid. ITSO NAPN Ukrayiny.
Hjelle, L.A., Ziegler, D.J. (1992). Personality Theories: Basic Assumptions, Research, and Applications. (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. New York. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf
Ivashkevich, E.Z. (2016). Sotsialnyy intelekt yak zdatnist osobystosti do sotsialʹnoho piznannya ta vzayemodiyi. Tekhnolohiyi rozvytku intelektu, 2(2). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/tri_2016_2_2_10
Nosenko, E.L., & Chetveryk-Burchak, A.H. (2016). Emotsiynyy intelekt yak chynnyk dosyahnennya zhyttyevoho uspikhu: monohrafiya. Vyd-vo «Osvita Ukrayiny».
Partnership for 21 st Century Skills. (2007). 21st Century Skills Assessment. http://www.p21.org/storage/documtnts/21st_Century_Skills_Assessment_e-paper.pdf
Shpak, M. (2011). Emotsiynyy intelekt v konteksti suchasnykh psykholohichnykh doslidzhen. Psychology of Personality, 1, 282–288. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Po_2011_1_36
Strauss, W. and Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Topuzov, O., Bibik, N., Lokshyna, O., & Onopriienko, O. (2022). Organisation of primary education at war in Ukraine: results of a survey of primary education specialists. Education: Modern Discourses, 5, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2022-5-01
Topuzov, O., Golovko, M., & Lokshyna, O. (2023). Osvitni vtraty v period voyenoho stanu: problemy diahnostyky ta kompensatsiyi. Ukrainian Educational Journal, 1, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-1-5-13.
Zayachuk, Y., & Oleksyshyn, A. (2022). Distance learning: its peculiarities in higher education during world pandemic COVID-19. Education: Modern Discourses, 5, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2022-5-12
