EXPRESS-METHOD OF THE STUDY OF THE SEDIMENT OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR OF ADOLESCENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2617-3107-2019-1-21Keywords:
adolescents; adolescents of vulnerable categories; express methodology; institution of secondary education; prosocial behaviorAbstract
The problem of diagnosing of the formation of prosocial behavior of adolescents - students of the institution of secondary education is considered. The rapid method «Prosocial behavior by pupils’ eyes» of research on the formation of adolescents of prosocial behavior, developed by the scientists of the Institute for Education Problems of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, is presented. The proposed rapid method of research on the formation of prosocial behavior is considered as a preliminary diagnostic tool, useful for planning and correction of educational work in a secondary education institution.
References
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S.C. (2007) Parent and peer correlates of prosocial development in rural adolescents: A longitudinal study.Journal of Research on Adolescence,17,301-324.
Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66, 911–936.
Espinosa, M. P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, Article ID 88.
Honcharenko, S. (2008). Pedahohichni doslidzhennia: Metodolohichni porady molodym naukovtsiam. [Pedagogical research. Methodological Advice for Young Scientists]. Kyiv-Vinnitsa: “Vinnytsia”.
Ignatskaya, O. (2008). Osobennosti izucheniya komponentov prosocial’noj napravlennosti lichnosti starsheklassnikov [Features of the study of the components of the prosocial orientation of the personality of senior pupils]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 4, 68-73.
Il’in E. (2013). Psihologiya uhoda. Al’truizm, egoizm, sochuvstvie. [Psychology of care. Altruism, selfishness, empathy]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Kalinina et al. (2017). Prohrama “15”: metod. posibnyk z profilaktyky VIL / SNIDu ta pidtrymky psykhosotsialnoho zdorovia v Ukraini. [Program “15”: method. manual on HIV / AIDS Prevention and Psychosocial Health Support in Ukraine]. Kyiv: FOP Saviskyi I.S.
Kirichenko, V.I., Yezhova, O.O., Necherda, V. B., Tarasova, T.V., & Demyanchuk, O. L. (2016). Formuvannia prosotsialnoi povedinky uchniv u profilaktychnomu osvitnomu seredovyshchi zahalnoosvitnoho navchalnoho zakladu: (monohrafiia). [Formation of prosocial behavior of students in a preventive educational environment of a comprehensive educational institution. (monograph)]. Ternopil: Terno Hraf.
Kuhtova, N. (2012). Osnovnyie faktoryi, determiniruyuschie proyavlenie lichnostyu prosotsialnogo povedeniya [The main factors determining the appearance of personality-prosocial behavior]. Aktualnyie napravleniya povyisheniya kachestva obrazovaniya v uchebnyih zavedeniyah razlichnogo tipa. Vitebsk. 252-255.
Kuhtova, N. V.; Skripacheva, E. I. (2017). Problematika issledovaniy prosotsialnogo povedeniya [Issues of research on prosocial behavior]. Psihologicheskiy Vademecum: Psihologicheskie prediktoryi individualnogo razvitiya lichnosti v usloviyah obrazovatelnoy sredyi. Vitebsk : VGU imeni P. M. Masherova, 72-77.
Kunitsyina, V.N., Kazarinova, N.V., Pogolsha, V.M. (2011) Mezhlichnostnoe obschenie [Interpersonal communication]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Kyrychenko, V., Necherda, V., & Tarasova, T. (2017). Formuvannia prosotsialnoi povedinky pidlitkiv urazlyvykh katehorii u zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladakh: do problemy doslidzhennia[Formation of prosocial behavior of adolescents of vulnerable categories in general educational institutions: to the research problem]. Psykholoho-pedahohichni problemy silskoi shkoly: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Pavla Tychyny, 56, 167-174.
Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 23-44). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media.
Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Freifeld, T. R. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.) Advances in personality assessment.(Vo l. 10). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Petrenko, M. (n.d.). Diagnosis of prosocial behavior in the domestic and foreign psychology. Retrieved 2019 from http://social-science.com.ua/article/1113
Rajgorodskij, D. (1998). Prakticheskaya psihodiagnostika. Tekhnika i testy: uchebnik. [Practical psychodiagnostics. Techniques and tests: a textbook]. Samara: Izdatel’skij Dom “Bahrah”.
Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221-241). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Sysoieva, S. & Krystopchuk, T. (2013). Metodolohiia naukovo-pedahohichnykh doslidzhen: Pidruchnyk. [Methodology of scientific and pedagogical research: Textbook]. Rivne: Volynski oberehy.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2009). Child-Friendly Schools Manual. New York: UNICEF
Zanden, V., James W. (1987) Social psychology. New York: McGraw. – Hill,Inc.
